Proved it before pitching it
Redesigned one process first: the lead follow-up, inside the CRM they already had. A week of manual chasing now took about an hour.
Nobody had asked for it. The result is what earned the mandate to redesign the rest.
A real Freedom Architects client, not an illustration: the work was led by Gökhan Üç, Business Architect, using the Changeover method. Approximate figures. Mike is happy to take a reference call.
Mike's company was turning over close to £40M a year when we started, and its sales were tracked on paper, in notebooks. A CRM the company had paid handsomely for was used as a spreadsheet. Every customer interaction was manual. Every touch was Mike's personal touch.
Leads arrived by email, one at a time, and were chased by hand over WhatsApp. Ten or fifteen a day was enough to swamp the team, and there was no way to grow past it without piling on people. No one owned the KPIs. Every important decision, relationship and sale ran back through the founder. The business was performing impressively, and it could not get through a day without him.
At the start of the work, all five areas were red: 14 of the 20 indicators red, 2 amber, 4 unknown and none green. Today, three indicators are green and four are amber.
The table shows the indicators with a clear answer at both points. The figures are approximate, and Mike is happy to take a reference call.
The work covered the five areas the scorecard measures. It started with one quick proof, and the software came last. Six pieces of work, in roughly this order:
Redesigned one process first: the lead follow-up, inside the CRM they already had. A week of manual chasing now took about an hour.
Nobody had asked for it. The result is what earned the mandate to redesign the rest.
Redesigned the lead-to-sale process first, then moved it to a CRM that fit it: Kommo, in place of the barely used Zoho they were paying for. Leads from any source now flow in, are assigned and get followed up.
Software came last. Once the process was designed, the right tool was the easy part. The bill fell by roughly half.
Every deal, from first contact to close to handover for renovation and letting, mapped and written down, with the routine steps run by the tools they already used.
The know-how moved off people's laptops and into the business. Aftersales workload dropped by around half.
Reworked the ad and agency contracts, and built referral structures, including fee-earning arrangements with accountancy firms.
Growth stopped depending on Mike personally writing every ad and preparing every pitch.
Responsibility maps and written SOPs across the business, from the website to the email campaigns.
Everyone knew their job, so decisions stopped routing back to the founder for a verdict. Ten of the 20 recurring decisions moved off Mike's desk, and a second person now approves payments when he is away.
Monthly figures for budget, marketing and advertising, produced by the system in one place.
Mike finally saw the bottlenecks instead of being one.
The new way of working ran in one country first, as a small prototype, alongside the old one. It had to prove itself before anyone would let it touch the rest.
It did. The pilot's results built the belief to roll the redesigned way of working out across the whole business, which grew from three countries to seven over the course of the work. Process design came first. The tool came last.
Approximate figures, after the systems were in. Over the same period the business grew from three countries to seven.
"Thanks to what you've built, we now work more efficiently and effectively than I could have imagined. I have even started taking holidays where I go days without looking at my phone."
Mike, founder
That first year, he took his first uninterrupted family holiday in fifteen years. His total involvement while away: one phone call, to approve payments. In October 2026 he left for a four-week holiday.
Mike could have hired someone. A chief operating officer, a number two to take it all off his hands. He did not, and not for lack of money. He would have had to hand the whole operation to one person and trust them with it, and that was not a trust he could give. What he needed was time, and a system he could still steer.
So that is what we built. He still approves the payments. He is still in the decisions that matter. He is the person who decides now, and the doing sits with the team. A new hire would have taken the doing and the deciding both. The architecture handed him the deciding back, without the doing.
Now, on a Sunday morning over coffee, Mike reads the whole week in about an hour. What the ads cost and what they returned, how the leads fell to each salesperson, who is likely to close what, where customers sit in the pipeline, the month's cash flow and P&L. Preparing those reports used to take the whole of Sunday.
The core build took twelve months, and the daily dependency was gone inside that year. The relationship continues, lighter now, two days a month, by Mike's choice, as the business is readied, in time, to stand entirely on its own or change hands.
The real problem was never the expensive CRM: no one had designed how the business should actually run, so the tool had nothing to carry. Once the organisation, the KPIs, the processes and the relationships were in place, the right software was the easy part.
It is the opposite of what most consultancies do. I watched dozens of six-figure strategy decks die on a shelf. Months of analysis, a big presentation, then a roadmap no one could implement. Implementation is what changes a business.
"So we build the plan with you."
The Self-Check scores the same five areas in about ten minutes, with the report on screen. Or talk it through on a 20-minute call.